The critique
The piece traces tactics back to warfare and chess — systems built around one leader controlling everything — and argues that copying tactical blueprints wholesale replaced actually understanding the game. When every coach installs the same system, the players stop being asked to think. The proposed fix isn't to throw out tactics; it's to shift the coach's role from control to clarity: direct attention, create understanding, embrace adaptation, and start from the actual players you have.
Why I needed to hear it
It's a good check on myself. The temptation, especially when you want to win, is to over-control — script more, instruct more, take the decision out of the player's hands so nothing goes wrong. But a player who only does what I told them hasn't developed, they've complied. Start from the names on the back of the shirts, give them clarity instead of commands, and let the system serve the players rather than the other way round. Winning and developing aren't enemies, but control and developing very much can be.
