Why this one is different
A lot of positional-play content is just prettier and prettier diagrams. This course goes the other direction — sixteen sections that include systems theory, complex systems, leadership, group dynamics, and references into neuroscience for learning and psychology for coaching. That is the stuff that actually changes how you coach, because positional play is not a set of positions, it is a way of getting a group of humans to solve problems together. You cannot separate the football from the people.
The platform's line I agree with
It's Just a Sport says every player deserves the best possible football experience, no matter their age or level. I am fully bought into that. It is basically my own starting point — coaching is for the players, and the bottom of the roster deserves the same quality of environment as the top. When a resource leads with that, I trust the rest of it more, because it means the methods are built to serve players rather than to make the coach look clever.
How I'd approach it
If you take this, take it as a way of thinking, not a system to install. The value is the theory — complexity, how people learn, how groups behave under a shared idea. Bring that back to your own game model and your own players. I would rather a coach finish this understanding why constraints work and how a group finds solutions than able to draw a perfect five-lane grid. The grid is not the point. The players learning to read and solve the game is the point.